Vanguard Teaching

Front and center of tomorrow's society – learn smarter, teach harder

Thomas Jefferson, School Bullies, and Standing Tall

On August 23, 1785, Thomas Jefferson, then the United States Minister to France, wrote a private letter to the then U.S. Secretary of Foreign Affairs, John Jay. In his message, he succinctly explained why the U.S., a militarily weak, newborn country, should engage in maritime trade. Jefferson acknowledged that this would be a profitable, yet dangerous, undertaking because powerful European nations would militarily exploit U.S. traders through intimidation, extortion, and incarceration. According to Jefferson, this weak naval status “provokes insult and injury.” However, Jefferson’s asserts that to counter these aggressions, force must be used to “reach an enemy”. He further proclaims that, “I think it is our interest to punish the first insult: because, an insult that goes unpunished is the parent of many others.”

In my 8th grade U.S. history course, I used the “insult that goes unpunished” quote to introduce the students to Jeffersonian Era of the U.S. The quote, along with many others, helped them to get a better insight into Jefferson’s mindset in handling British and French naval harassment with the Embargo Act of 1807 and ultimately, his decision to go to war with the Barbary States of North Africa. To a large majority of my 8th graders, Jefferson’s philosophy was clear: “hit back at a bully.” In fact, I did not read too much into the quote but my students usually resonated with the philosophy quite well. It was in my fifth year at my “troubled, inner-city school” that a student publicly expressed what he felt about lessons of Jefferson and the harassment from foreign nations. He stated, “You’re teaching us about how Jefferson fought back against bullies. But you guys tell us not to fight back against bullies. That’s some hypocritical bullshit.” A sea of students nodded their heads and a few gave mmm-hmm’s in agreement with him like he was preaching powerful truth during Sunday service. At the moment, I had to plead the 5th to them and smile nervously. By that time of the year, our class had already learned about and debated many aspects of the Constitution, so they understood the implications of why I pleaded the 5th – I agreed with their disappointment in the official approach to handling bullies. Spouting off my dissatisfaction about the official “passive method” of reproaching bullies and what we should do about them would have been unprofessional; however, I understood and felt his frustration.

From my pedagogy and classroom management courses in college and district professional developments, the consensus was to employ a counter-bullying strategy of teaching students not to fight a bully – but rather ignore him or her, inform an adult, etc. In each level of anti-bullying training, I cemented my mouth to refrain from saying, “Bullshit!” Zero-tolerance policies and strictly teaching passivity in the eyes of a bully can be counter-productive and can make students lose faith in the school system and those who they see represent it. I have close friends who were on the receiving end of bullying and when they tried to physically defend themselves, they were punished to the same extent of the perpetrator due to the school’s “zero tolerance” policy.

I have personally experienced verbal and physical bullying in two distinct instances of my early childhood. The most vivid instance was when I was in 2nd grade when my family moved from an ethnically diverse area of Tampa to a predominantly White neighborhood in Austin. Daily, my tormentors helped me become aware that I was one of the only Black kids in the school. This went on for about the first two weeks at school. The offenses happened at the bus stop, on the bus, in the hallways and on the playground. After informing my parents (both of whom grew up in Memphis in the 60s and 70s) of the situations, they implored that I hit the bullies back. Bullying solved. For both instances, stepping up to the bullies paid off. These experiences, along with knowledge of examples from history, helped me to internalize the philosophy that passivity (or even, dare I say) appeasement is not an effective solution to stop bullying.

Administrators and educators must understand and take into account that there are many students who have anti-bullying strategies that may run counter to popular sanctioned strategies. They may have learned it from their parents, their history textbooks or even their personal experience. I strongly believe that the whole anti-bullying campaign should do some soul searching so that it does not become the same as the failed campaign of D.A.R.E. and other social engineering campaigns of the not to far past.  As an educator, I understand that I cannot sanction a policy of knuckling up to bullies. However, as a parent to my son, I will echo the shared philosophy of my parents and Thomas Jefferson – stand tall to a bully or prepare for constant harassment.

4 comments on “Thomas Jefferson, School Bullies, and Standing Tall

  1. The Sentient FlySwatter
    April 13, 2016

    Nice topic! How’s does bullying via social media and outside the school by peers factor into a school’s approach to setting up an anti-bullying campaign?

    What about setting up a group or committee of teachers and an administrator or two to serve as interventionists for dealing with the bullies and bullied?

    Like

    • Jason Khaleed Hayes
      April 13, 2016

      Hey The Sentient FlySwatter! Thanks for the feedback. Definitely peer intervention programs and committees led by caring individuals should help out as well. The peer intervention programs are like the trained sheep dogs to help the flock. Preventing bully behavior and spotting out baby bullies definitely should be at the forefront of the campaign as well.

      Liked by 1 person

  2. The MisEducated Banana
    April 14, 2016

    What are your thoughts on having the bully and bullied work together on school service projects or tasks for teachers? Some bullies suffer from social anxieties and don’t know the best methods for interacting with others. Putting these kids together, forcing them to work with each other and get to know each other might be helpful…and also introspective from the vantage point of the bully.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Jason Khaleed Hayes
      April 21, 2016

      I am for that program if the bullied is a driving force for that. Making the bullied collaborate with the bully can result in more psychological trauma for the bullied if s/he feels that s/he not in control of this project. Yes, bullies definitely need attention in mitigating and ultimately eliminating their nefarious activities. Moreover, we still need to work on preventing the rise of bullies. However, I feel that there are situations when the bullied can stand up to the bully to stop the bullying.

      Like

Please join the discussion

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Information

This entry was posted on April 13, 2016 by in For Instructional Coaches, Tips For Teachers and tagged , , , .
%d bloggers like this: